Skip to content

Best Kafka tools for Spring Kafka and Spring Cloud Stream

Comparisons
Chad Harris·October 3, 2026·15 min read

The best Kafka tool for teams running Spring Kafka and Spring Cloud Stream applications is one that shows every listener’s consumer group and lag, simple groups included, reads dead-letter records with the exception headers Spring writes, draws each Kafka Streams application’s topology with its thread and state store metrics, gates and records offset resets per person when every application reaches Kafka as one service identity, and runs as one container beside the cluster, out of the data path. Kpow, Kafbat UI, AKHQ, Spring Boot Actuator and Micrometer, and Conduktor each cover part of that. Scored on the six weighted criteria explained below the rankings, Kpow ranks first with 99 out of 110, ahead of Kafbat UI at 68 and AKHQ at 60; Conduktor, listed last, totals 59.

Tools compared

Kafka tools for Spring Kafka and Spring Cloud Stream applications scored against this page's rubric (read 3 October 2026). Total is the weighted score out of 110, with the criteria in order of weight; the weights are explained under how these tools were scored. Conduktor is listed last whatever its total; on its total of 59 it would place fourth, ahead of Spring Boot Actuator and Micrometer.
Rank Tool Total (out of 110) Out of the data path Spring application visibility Production access on request Audit trail per person Directory and Kafka sign-in Many teams, shared clusters Cost a year, one cluster (modelled)
1 Kpow 99 One container, no external database, not a proxy Streams topologies and metrics via an open-source agent; all groups, simple included; DLT headers GROUP_EDIT permission, temporary policies, staged changes Every offset reset and data query, by user SAML, OpenID, LDAP Tenants per team $7,380
2 Kafbat UI 68 One container Consumer groups and records; no Streams view Read-only clusters, no approvals Opt-in log, no view in the product OAuth2, OIDC, LDAP Roles per resource $8,640
3 AKHQ 60 One container Consumer groups and records; no Streams view Group roles, no approvals Opt-in topic, no reads LDAP, OIDC Regex group roles $8,640
4 Spring Boot Actuator and Micrometer 40 Inside each app, plus a metrics store Metrics and a topology description per app, nothing drawn Per-app endpoint security; bindings can be paused None by person Per-app Spring Security None $14,400
5 Conduktor 59 PostgreSQL; Gateway proxy for data controls Consumer groups and records; no Streams view described Masking exemptions, owner approvals 70+ event types, by user LDAP, OIDC Groups across clusters; Virtual Clusters need Gateway $32,880

The tools, ranked for Spring Kafka and Spring Cloud Stream

Rank 1

99 out of 110 Total

Try Kpow in the live demo No signup needed.

Cost a year
$4,500 per Kafka cluster with 100 users included, plus about $2,880 in operator time, so $7,380 on one cluster (modelled)
On Spring
Kafka Streams topologies and metrics through an open-source agent; listeners through their consumer groups
Deployment
One container or JAR, no external database
Out of the data path ×3 weight, this criterion counts 3 times toward the total
9 out of 10
Spring application visibility ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
9 out of 10
Production access on request ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
9 out of 10
Audit trail per person ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
9 out of 10
Directory and Kafka sign-in
9 out of 10
Many teams, shared clusters
9 out of 10
Why these scores for Kpow
Out of the data path 9 out of 10
It is one container or JAR whose snapshots, metrics and audit log live in topics on your own cluster, it reads Kafka as an ordinary client, and the Streams agent inside a Spring application writes to a Kafka topic rather than to Kpow, so nothing sits between your applications and the brokers.
Spring application visibility 9 out of 10
Of the tools on this page it is the only one that draws Kafka Streams topologies: the open-source Streams agent, registered from a Spring StreamsBuilderFactoryBean as Factor House’s Spring Kafka and Spring Cloud Stream example repositories show, sends the topology and thread, task, state store and RocksDB metrics to a Kafka topic, and Kpow serves them to Prometheus as well. Plain @KafkaListener services appear through their consumer groups, simple groups included, and dead-letter records can be read with their headers. It is held below 10 because the agent is a dependency and a few lines of wiring in every Streams application, the Spring wiring comes as example code rather than a packaged starter, and the Streams view is a Kpow Enterprise feature.
Production access on request 9 out of 10
Resetting a consumer group’s offsets needs the GROUP_EDIT permission, temporary policies grant time-boxed access that an admin or a change system calling the Kpow API can create, staged mutations hold changes for approval, and data policies mask fields in data inspect, though masking is per resource rather than per viewer.
Audit trail per person 9 out of 10
Every action, from a data inspect query on a dead-letter topic to an offset reset on a Spring application’s consumer group, is recorded with the user from the identity provider, with a seven-day view in the product, the record written to an audit topic on your own cluster, and webhooks that send it to a SIEM for long-term retention.
Directory and Kafka sign-in 9 out of 10
People sign in with SAML, OpenID or LDAP, and Kpow connects to Kafka with the same SASL or TLS settings as any client; the Streams agent’s producer takes the same security settings as the Spring application it runs in.
Many teams, shared clusters 9 out of 10
Tenants scope each team to its own topics and consumer groups on a shared cluster, and RBAC adds Allow, Deny or Stage per action.

On Spring Kafka and Spring Cloud Stream. Kpow’s Kafka Streams documentation covers the Kpow Streams agent: add io.factorhouse:kpow-streams-agent from Maven Central, create a StreamsRegistry from producer properties for the cluster, and register the KafkaStreams and Topology instances with it. The Spring Kafka example registers them from a StreamsBuilderFactoryBean listener when the streams are added, and the Spring Cloud Stream example looks up the factory bean named &stream-builder- plus the function name. Topologies show in the Kpow Streams UI, and the metrics are served at Kpow’s /streams/v1 Prometheus endpoint.

Where it falls short. The agent covers Kafka Streams applications only. A Spring service built on @KafkaListener or the Spring Cloud Stream Kafka binder has no topology to draw, and Kpow sees it through its consumer group, its topics and its records, as every tool on this page does. The Spring wiring is shown in two example repositories, which pin agent 1.0.0 while the agent README lists a later release, rather than in a Spring Boot starter. Kpow governs people working through Kpow, so each application’s own actuator endpoints stay as open as the application leaves them. The Streams view, RBAC, masking, staged mutations and the full audit log need Kpow Enterprise; Community Edition is free for 3 clusters and 10 users.

Rank 2

68 out of 110 Total

Cost a year
$0 licence, about $8,640 in operator time (modelled)
On Spring
Consumer groups, lag and records; no Kafka Streams view
Sign-in
OAuth2, OIDC and LDAP, free
Out of the data path ×3 weight, this criterion counts 3 times toward the total
9 out of 10
Spring application visibility ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
4 out of 10
Production access on request ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
4 out of 10
Audit trail per person ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
6 out of 10
Directory and Kafka sign-in
7 out of 10
Many teams, shared clusters
6 out of 10
Why these scores for Kafbat UI
Out of the data path 9 out of 10
It is one stateless container with no database and no proxy, the same pass as Kpow.
Spring application visibility 4 out of 10
It lists consumer groups with their lag and browses records, so a Spring application’s group and its dead-letter topic are visible, but its documentation describes no Kafka Streams topology or metrics view, and the resources its RBAC governs are cluster configuration, topics, consumers, schemas, Connect, connectors, ksqlDB and ACLs, with no entry for a Streams application.
Production access on request 4 out of 10
RBAC grants actions per resource and a cluster can be set read-only, but there is no approval step, no time-boxed grant, and its masking applies the same way to every viewer.
Audit trail per person 6 out of 10
Its audit log names the logged-in user and records reads when the level is set to ALL, but it writes to a topic or the console with no view in the product, so reading the trail is something you build.
Directory and Kafka sign-in 7 out of 10
It supports OAuth2 and OIDC, including Microsoft Entra ID, and LDAP or Active Directory, and its documentation does not list SAML.
Many teams, shared clusters 6 out of 10
Roles scope permissions per resource and list the clusters they apply to, with no tenant view of a team’s own resources.

On Spring applications. Kafbat UI sees a Spring application the way it sees any Kafka client: through its consumer group, its topics and the records on them. Its RBAC documentation lists the resources it governs, none of them a Streams application. The Kafbat UI review covers the rest.

Where it falls short. A Kafka Streams application appears only as its consumer group and internal topics, with no topology, thread or state store view. There is no way to grant production access for an hour and have it expire or to hold an offset reset for approval. Its modelled running cost on one cluster is 6 engineer-hours a month, $8,640 a year at $120 an hour.

Rank 3

AKHQ

akhq.io

60 out of 110 Total

Cost a year
$0 licence, about $8,640 in operator time (modelled)
On Spring
Consumer groups, lag and records; no Kafka Streams view
Security default
Disabled until you enable it
Out of the data path ×3 weight, this criterion counts 3 times toward the total
9 out of 10
Spring application visibility ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
4 out of 10
Production access on request ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
3 out of 10
Audit trail per person ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
4 out of 10
Directory and Kafka sign-in
6 out of 10
Many teams, shared clusters
5 out of 10
Why these scores for AKHQ
Out of the data path 9 out of 10
It is one stateless container with no database and no proxy, the same pass as Kpow.
Spring application visibility 4 out of 10
It lists consumer groups with their lag and browses records, so a Spring application’s group and its dead-letter topic are visible, but the AKHQ review records that it does not visualise Kafka Streams topologies or JMX metrics.
Production access on request 3 out of 10
Groups bind actions to resources by regex, but there is no approval step or time-boxed grant, masking is global, and without the JWT signing secret the restriction is in the UI only.
Audit trail per person 4 out of 10
Audit events are opt-in to a Kafka topic, reads are not recorded, and there is no view for the trail.
Directory and Kafka sign-in 6 out of 10
It supports LDAP, OIDC and header authentication from a proxy, does not list SAML, and ships with security disabled until you enable it.
Many teams, shared clusters 5 out of 10
Groups combine resource types with regex patterns on names and clusters, which limits what a role can reach, but there is no tenant view of a team’s own resources.

On Spring applications. AKHQ sees a Spring application through its consumer group, its topics and its records, and its roles decide who may read them or change a group’s offsets. The AKHQ review records the missing Kafka Streams topology view and covers the rest.

Where it falls short. Security is off until you configure it, the audit trail is an opt-in topic that does not record reads, and a Kafka Streams application is only a consumer group and a set of internal topics to it. Its modelled running cost on one cluster is 6 engineer-hours a month, $8,640 a year at $120 an hour.

Rank 4

Spring Boot Actuator and Micrometer

docs.spring.io

40 out of 110 Total

Cost a year
$0 licence, about $14,400 in operator time (modelled)
On Spring
Built in: Micrometer metrics, a topology endpoint and binding controls, per application
Security default
Every endpoint but health secured once Spring Security is on the classpath
Out of the data path ×3 weight, this criterion counts 3 times toward the total
6 out of 10
Spring application visibility ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
5 out of 10
Production access on request ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
1 out of 10
Audit trail per person ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
2 out of 10
Directory and Kafka sign-in
4 out of 10
Many teams, shared clusters
2 out of 10
Why these scores for Spring Boot Actuator and Micrometer
Out of the data path 6 out of 10
The endpoints live inside each application, so nothing new sits in the data path, but reading the metrics over time needs a store such as Prometheus beside them, which is a database of its own.
Spring application visibility 5 out of 10
Spring for Apache Kafka’s KafkaStreamsMicrometerListener registers Kafka Streams meters, the Spring Cloud Stream Kafka binder reports consumer lag through Micrometer, and the Kafka Streams binder’s kafkastreamstopology endpoint, disabled by default, returns the topology description for an external tool to draw; every piece is there, but each application reports only on itself and nothing draws the topology.
Production access on request 1 out of 10
Who may call an endpoint is whatever each application’s security configuration says, and the bindings endpoint can stop, start, pause and resume a binding in production, with no per-person grant that expires, no approval step and no masking.
Audit trail per person 2 out of 10
Nothing in these endpoints records which person paused a binding or reset an offset, so a record of who did what is something the team builds.
Directory and Kafka sign-in 4 out of 10
Spring Security can put the endpoints behind any sign-in the application supports, but it is configured application by application rather than once for everyone across the cluster.
Many teams, shared clusters 2 out of 10
Each application reports on itself, and nothing shows which team owns which consumer group, topic or Streams application on a shared cluster.

On Spring applications. Spring’s own tooling is where most teams start. Spring for Apache Kafka’s Kafka Streams support includes a KafkaStreamsMicrometerListener that registers Micrometer meters for the KafkaStreams object a factory bean manages. The Kafka binder metrics include each consumer group’s lag behind the latest offset, and the Kafka Streams binder’s topology visualization endpoints return a topology description “using which you can visualize the topology using external tools”. The bindings endpoint lists bindings and can stop, start, pause and resume them.

Where it falls short. It is a toolkit, not a tool: a Grafana board per metric family, a topology description to draw elsewhere, and controls reached application by application. Spring Boot’s endpoint documentation asks teams to check that exposed endpoints hold no sensitive information or are secured, behind a firewall or by Spring Security. Its modelled running cost is 10 engineer-hours a month, $14,400 a year at $120 an hour.

Rank 5

Conduktor

conduktor.io

59 out of 110 Total

Cost a year
25 Console seats at $1,200 is $30,000 plus $2,880 operator time, so $32,880; Gateway Core adds $60,000 and Gateway Protect, which carries encryption and masking, a further $30,000 (modelled)
On Spring
Consumer groups, lag and records; no Kafka Streams view described
Deployment
Console on PostgreSQL 13+; data-level controls through Gateway, a proxy
Out of the data path ×3 weight, this criterion counts 3 times toward the total
3 out of 10
Spring application visibility ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
4 out of 10
Production access on request ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
6 out of 10
Audit trail per person ×2 weight, this criterion counts 2 times toward the total
8 out of 10
Directory and Kafka sign-in
7 out of 10
Many teams, shared clusters
7 out of 10
Why these scores for Conduktor
Out of the data path 3 out of 10
Console needs PostgreSQL 13 or later, and its encryption, data-level masking and Virtual Clusters only work when client traffic goes through Gateway, a proxy in the data path.
Spring application visibility 4 out of 10
Console lists consumer groups with their lag and browses records, so a Spring application’s group and its dead-letter topic are visible, but Conduktor’s documentation, searched in full on 3 October 2026, describes no Kafka Streams topology or metrics view.
Production access on request 6 out of 10
Masking can exempt users or groups, which beats every other tool here on who sees unmasked data, and cross-team access requests are approved by the owning team, but no expiring grant is described and topic creation that passes policy is a direct API call.
Audit trail per person 8 out of 10
Console logs produce, consume and admin requests across more than 70 event types with user, IP and timestamp, browsable in the UI and exported as CloudEvents.
Directory and Kafka sign-in 7 out of 10
Its SSO configuration covers LDAP and OIDC, with guides for Okta, Entra ID and Keycloak, and does not describe SAML.
Many teams, shared clusters 7 out of 10
Permissions are set per user or group across clusters, but a user in several groups inherits the most permissive grant, and Virtual Clusters for multi-tenancy need Gateway.

On Spring applications. Conduktor Console sees a Spring application through its consumer group, its topics and its records. Its data-level controls, encryption, masking of the data itself and virtual clusters, run in Conduktor Gateway, which applications reach by connecting to Gateway instead of the brokers, so a Spring application under those controls has Gateway as its bootstrap address. The Conduktor review covers the rest.

Where it falls short. Console needs PostgreSQL, and putting Gateway’s controls on Spring applications puts Gateway in front of every listener and Streams application. On AWS Marketplace, Conduktor Enterprise lists Console at $1,200 a seat for the first 100 seats, Gateway Core, which carries virtual clusters, at $60,000 a year, and Gateway Protect, the add-on for encryption and masking, at a further $30,000.

What teams using Spring Kafka and Spring Cloud Stream need

This page is about Kafka tools for teams whose applications are built with Spring for Apache Kafka, the spring-kafka library behind KafkaTemplate and @KafkaListener, or with Spring Cloud Stream and its Kafka and Kafka Streams binders. Neither is a Kafka platform: both are frameworks inside the application, so the question here is how a tool sees, governs and records work on Spring applications, whatever Kafka they connect to. How the library itself is set up is covered in Kafka with Spring Boot. Spring applications come in two kinds, and a tool treats them differently. A listener service, @KafkaListener or a Spring Cloud Stream function on the Kafka binder, is an ordinary consumer and producer. A Kafka Streams application, built with Spring’s StreamsBuilderFactoryBean or the Kafka Streams binder, also keeps state stores, internal topics and a topology of processors.

A Kafka Streams application’s application.id is used in several places at once: as the consumer group it reads through, the prefix of its internal topic names and the name of its local state directory, as the Kafka Streams configuration reference lists. The same reference advises changing it when an application is updated unless the existing internal topics and state stores should be reused, so a renamed Spring function or a new version suffix starts a new consumer group and new internal topics while the old ones stay on the cluster. A tool that shows the group, the internal topics and the topology side by side makes that visible; one that shows only consumer groups leaves the old group looking like a stalled consumer.

A Kafka Streams application’s topology and its thread and state store metrics live inside the application, so a tool that shows them needs some code running there. In Kpow’s case that is the Streams agent, which is Factor House code that runs inside the customer’s own application and is published under the Apache 2.0 licence, so a security team can read exactly what it does before it goes into a Spring service.

Not every Spring consumer is a consumer group member. A @KafkaListener that names its partitions with topicPartitions, as the listener annotation documentation shows, assigns them itself and commits offsets without joining a group, and Kafka’s admin API reports such groups as simple consumer groups (ConsumerGroupListing). A lag view that lists only classic groups misses them.

A Spring dead-letter topic carries its diagnosis in the headers. When Spring for Apache Kafka’s DeadLetterPublishingRecoverer publishes a failed record, it adds the exception class, the cause, the exception message and the full stack trace as record headers, as the error handling documentation lists. Triage is reading those headers beside the record, so a tool needs to show headers on the dead-letter topic. The options for that work are compared in the best tools to manage a dead letter queue in Kafka.

A Kafka Streams offset reset is more than an offset reset. Kafka’s application reset tool requires every instance of the application to be stopped, “otherwise, the application may enter an invalid state, crash, or produce incorrect results”, resets the input topics’ offsets, deletes the internal topics, and leaves the local state directory on each machine for the team to delete. Moving a Streams application’s group offsets in a UI while its changelogs and state stores still hold the old results is therefore a partial reset, and the permission to do it belongs with people who know the difference.

Out of the data path. Every Spring application is a Kafka client with its own bootstrap address, set in spring.kafka.bootstrap-servers or the binder’s brokers property. A tool whose controls work only when client traffic passes through a proxy needs every listener and Streams application pointed at the proxy instead of the brokers, and they then depend on the proxy staying up. A management tool needs nothing more than its own client connection to Kafka. Kpow is one container with no external database, installed in your own environment and out of the data path, and its Streams agent writes to a Kafka topic rather than to Kpow. Conduktor Console also connects directly, with a PostgreSQL database of its own; Conduktor’s data-level controls, such as encryption, masking of the data itself and virtual clusters, run in Conduktor Gateway, a Kafka proxy that client applications connect through.

Spring application visibility. For a listener service this means the consumer group and its lag, simple groups included, and the dead-letter topic with its headers. For a Kafka Streams application it also means the topology, the thread, task and state store metrics, and the internal topics, tied together by the application.id. Spring itself exposes the raw material per application: the Kafka binder’s lag metric through Micrometer, and the Kafka Streams binder’s /actuator/kafkastreamstopology endpoint, which is disabled by default and returns a topology description for external tools to draw.

Production access on request. Spring’s own production controls are endpoints inside each application. The bindings endpoint can stop, start, pause and resume a binding, and Spring Boot’s endpoint documentation says that when Spring Security is on the classpath with no other security filter chain, every actuator but health is secured, and that a custom filter chain takes over those rules. Who may pause a consumer in production is therefore decided separately in every application. What a tool adds is per person and per action: who may read records, who may reset a group’s offsets, access to production that expires after the task, and a second person’s approval before a change.

Audit trail per person. A Spring application authenticates to Kafka as its own service principal, and a shared tool reaches Kafka as one identity too, so the brokers’ records name the application or the tool, not the engineer who reset a listener’s offsets or read a dead-letter record. The only record of which person did it has to come from the tool they used. The options are compared in the best tools for Kafka audit logging.

Directory and Kafka sign-in. The tool connects to Kafka with the same SASL or TLS settings the Spring applications use, and people sign in through the company directory over SAML, OpenID Connect or LDAP, so an offset reset is tied to a named person rather than a shared credential. Where an agent runs inside the application, it should take the application’s own Kafka security settings rather than a second credential.

Many teams, shared clusters. Spring services from many teams usually share one cluster, and each team needs its own view of its own consumer groups, topics and Streams applications, and permission to touch only those.

Kpow does not win on every point. Spring Boot Actuator and Micrometer have nothing to deploy beyond the applications and a metrics store, and they hold every metric Kpow shows. Kpow’s topology view needs the agent added to each Kafka Streams application, and Kpow governs people working through Kpow, so the applications’ own actuator endpoints stay as open as each application leaves them.

How a team runs Kpow with Spring Kafka and Spring Cloud Stream

Installing it beside the cluster. Kpow runs as one Docker container, a Java JAR or from the Helm charts, in the same network as the cluster the Spring applications use. It needs no external database, because its snapshots, metrics and audit log live in topics on the Kafka cluster. Nothing changes in the Spring applications for the listener views below; only the Kafka Streams view needs the agent.

Watching listener services. Every @KafkaListener and Spring Cloud Stream binder consumer appears under consumer groups with its members, offsets and lag. Simple groups, such as a listener that assigns its own partitions, are observed by default, controlled by SNAPSHOT_SIMPLE_GROUPS in the environment variables. Group actions include resetting offsets to a value or a timestamp, setting them to the earliest offset and skipping one offset on a partition.

Reading dead-letter records. In data inspect, selecting a headers deserializer includes each record’s headers in the results, so the exception class, message and stack trace Spring adds to a dead-letter record are read beside the record, and kJQ filters narrow the topic to one exception type.

Adding the Streams agent to a Spring Kafka application. The application takes io.factorhouse:kpow-streams-agent as a dependency. The Spring Kafka example, built on Confluent’s Spring orders service, adds a component that listens on the StreamsBuilderFactoryBean and, when the streams are added, creates a StreamsRegistry from the factory’s streams configuration and registers the KafkaStreams instance and its Topology. The application then logs a line for each snapshot it sends, and the application appears in Kpow’s Streams view within a minute or two.

Adding it to a Spring Cloud Stream application. The Spring Cloud Stream example, the Kafka Streams binder’s word count sample, looks up the factory bean named &stream-builder- plus the function name from spring.cloud.stream.function.definition, and registers its streams and topology the same way. In that repository the registry’s producer properties are built by hand with the bootstrap address, because the factory’s own configuration held the address in a form that failed at startup; its README also points to the consumer groups view to reset the word count offsets.

Securing the agent. The StreamsRegistry producer takes the same SSL and SASL settings as any Kafka producer, from security.protocol and sasl.jaas.config to keystores and OAuth token endpoints, and on a cluster with ACLs its principal needs Write on the __oprtr_snapshot_state topic. By default the agent keys its snapshots by the cluster ID, read once through an AdminClient; where a Kafka service does not provide a cluster ID, or the team does not want the agent creating an AdminClient, a manual key strategy uses the environment name set in Kpow instead. Metric filters, which work like Micrometer’s meter filters, decide which metrics the agent sends, for example RocksDB metrics only (Kafka Streams documentation).

Reading topologies and metrics. Each registered application shows its topology and its Stream-Thread, state store and RocksDB metrics in Kpow’s Streams UI, alongside the consumer group named by its application.id. With the Prometheus integration on, /streams/v1 serves the Kafka Streams metrics from every agent and /streams/v1/state their state metrics, so one alert covers every Spring Streams application rather than one actuator per service.

Deciding who may do what. Kpow’s authorization actions put resetting offsets behind GROUP_EDIT and deleting groups behind GROUP_DELETE, and RBAC sets Allow, Deny or Stage per action, so a team can read its dead-letter topics without being able to move a Streams application’s offsets. Tenants give each team a view limited to its own topics and groups, and a temporary policy grants extra access that expires after the task.

Signing people in and keeping the record. Engineers sign in through SAML, OpenID Connect or LDAP. The audit log records every offset reset and data inspect query with the user from the identity provider, even though Kpow reaches Kafka as one client, and a webhook sends those records to Slack, Microsoft Teams or any HTTP endpoint, such as a SIEM collector.

Kpow live demo

See the Kpow UI before you add the Streams agent

The live Kpow demo runs on two Apache Kafka clusters on Amazon MSK. It shows brokers, topics, consumer groups, schema registries and the __oprtr_audit_log topic where Kpow keeps its audit trail, with no signup. Your own Spring applications are not in it, so pointing Kpow at your cluster and adding the Streams agent to one Kafka Streams application is the step to try next.

For teams choosing a Kafka tool for their Spring applications.

Try the Kpow demo

FAQ

What is the best Kafka tool for Spring Kafka and Spring Cloud Stream?

On this page’s rubric, Kpow, with 99 of 110 points: of the tools here it is the only one that draws Kafka Streams topologies, through an open-source agent the Spring application registers, it shows every listener’s consumer group, simple groups included, and dead-letter records with their headers, it records every offset reset against the person who made it, and it runs as one container with no external database. Kafbat UI is the highest-scoring free option.

Does Kpow work with Spring Boot applications?

Yes. Kpow reads Kafka as an ordinary client, so every Spring Kafka listener and Spring Cloud Stream binder consumer shows up through its consumer group, topics and records with no change to the application. For Kafka Streams applications, the Kpow Streams agent adds topologies and metrics; Factor House publishes a Spring Kafka example and a Spring Cloud Stream example of the wiring, and the Kafka Streams documentation covers the agent. The Streams view is a Kpow Enterprise feature.

How do I see the topology of a Spring Cloud Stream Kafka Streams application?

The Kafka Streams binder can return the topology description at /actuator/kafkastreamstopology once the endpoint is enabled and exposed, as the Spring Cloud Stream documentation describes, and an external tool draws it. Kpow draws it directly once the application registers its streams and topology with the Kpow Streams agent.

Why does my Spring listener not show lag in my Kafka UI?

If the @KafkaListener names its partitions with topicPartitions, it assigns them itself and does not join a consumer group, and Kafka reports its committed offsets as a simple consumer group. A tool that lists only classic groups misses it. Kpow observes simple groups by default.

Is there a free Kafka tool for Spring applications?

Kafbat UI and AKHQ are open source and show a Spring application’s consumer groups, topics and records, without a Kafka Streams topology view. Spring Boot Actuator and Micrometer come with Spring and expose the metrics and a topology description per application. The Streams view in Kpow is an Enterprise feature; Kpow Community Edition is free on up to 3 clusters and 10 users for the rest of Kpow. More free options are compared in the best free Kafka UI tools.

How these tools were scored

Five of the six criteria are the ones Factor House scores on every page for teams that share a Kafka cluster; the sixth is Spring application visibility. They are listed here in order of weight. Each criterion is scored 0 to 10: 10 where a tool is the only one here doing it or clearly the best, 8 for a clean documented pass, 5 or 6 for partial support or support that needs work the reader must verify, 1 to 4 for a weak or indirect form, and 0 where it is absent. The weights add up to 11, so totals are out of 110.

1. Out of the data path (counts three times). The tool should run in your own environment, reach Kafka as an ordinary client and keep no data outside your own cluster. Scored lower: tools that need an external database of their own, and tools whose controls work only when application traffic passes through a vendor’s proxy. A self-hosted container with no external database and no proxy scores 9, an option that needs a metrics database of its own 6, and one that needs both a database and a proxy for its controls 3; 10 is kept for an option with nothing to deploy at all, and no option here qualifies. This criterion is scored the same way on every Factor House page that uses it, and only its weight changes with the reader.

2. Spring application visibility (counts twice). Whether the tool shows each Spring application’s consumer group and lag, simple groups included, reads dead-letter records with their headers, and, for Kafka Streams applications, draws the topology and shows thread, task and state store metrics across applications. A tool that shows consumer groups and records but no Streams view scores 4.

3. Production access on request (counts twice). Whether an engineer can be granted access to production for one task and have it expire, whether permissions separate reading records from resetting offsets, whether a destructive change can be held for a second person’s approval, and whether sensitive fields can be masked from people who do not need them.

4. Audit trail per person (counts twice). Whether the tool records each action, data queries included, against the person from the identity provider, and whether that record can be read in the product and sent to the systems that keep it long term.

5. Directory and Kafka sign-in (counts once). Whether people sign in through SAML, OpenID Connect or LDAP, and whether the tool connects to Kafka with the same SASL or TLS settings as any client.

6. Many teams, shared clusters (counts once). Whether each team can be given its own view of its own topics and consumer groups on a shared cluster, and whether one deployment reaches several clusters.

Costs are modelled for one production Kafka cluster and 25 engineers at $120 per engineer hour, using the same hours per tool class as Factor House’s other comparison pages. Tools with a licence carry the published price plus 2 hours a month to run. The open-source UIs carry 6 hours a month, $8,640 a year, to run, secure and keep current, and Spring Boot Actuator and Micrometer, with the metrics store and dashboards behind them, carry 10 hours a month, $14,400, the figure used for Prometheus and Grafana elsewhere on the site. Kpow’s $7,380 uses the published price of $4,500 per cluster with 100 users included. Conduktor’s Console is $1,200 a seat on AWS Marketplace, and its Gateway Core and Gateway Protect prices are added for the data-level controls.

The criteria map onto how Spring applications use Kafka in the figure below.

F1 From how Spring runs Kafka to what a tool has to do
What the Spring application does What the tool has to do
Listeners Reads through a consumer group, or assigns partitions itself when a listener names them Show lag for every group, simple groups included
Dead letters Publishes a failed record to a dead-letter topic with the exception class, message and stack trace as headers Read the dead-letter topic with its headers
Streams apps Uses its application.id as the consumer group, the internal topic prefix and the state directory name Tie the topology, the group and the internal topics together
Streams metrics Reports thread, task and state store metrics from inside the application, not from the broker Collect them from the application and show them across applications
Actuator Exposes endpoints that can pause, stop and restart bindings, secured per application Give people controls by person and action, and record who used them
Resets Needs every instance stopped and internal topics and local state cleared for a full reset Gate offset resets behind a permission and keep the record
Each row starts from how a Spring Kafka or Spring Cloud Stream application works, as the Spring and Apache Kafka documentation describes it, then names what a Kafka tool needs in order to work with it.

Every option is scored from 0 to 10 on each criterion, from the evidence and sources this page cites, and the reason for each score is on its card. The criteria are weighted: Out of the data path counts three times, Spring application visibility counts twice, Production access on request counts twice, Audit trail per person counts twice, Directory and Kafka sign-in counts once and Many teams, shared clusters counts once, for a total out of 110. Out of the data path counts three times. Every Spring application is a Kafka client with its own bootstrap address, so a tool whose controls work through a proxy has to sit in front of every listener and Streams application, and a tool that needs a database of its own is one more stateful service beside them. Spring application visibility, production access on request and the per-person audit trail count twice: Kafka Streams metrics and topologies only exist inside the application, a Spring application reaches Kafka as one service identity whoever changes its offsets, and Spring's own controls are endpoints secured application by application. Directory and Kafka sign-in, and shared clusters, count once. This page is published by Factor House, which makes Kpow. Every option is scored on the same rubric and the same sources: Kpow's per-criterion scores are set the same way as every other option's and are not adjusted, and the weights apply to every option alike. Kpow ranks first on its total of 99 out of 110. The other options follow by total. Conduktor is listed last whatever its total; on its total of 59 it would place fourth.

Related reading